Homeland Security Council Warns of Preposterous Anthrax Attack

Kurt Nimmo
Infowars
December 3, 2008
In the wake of Mumbai, Congress has decided to add to the terrorism hype by releasing yet another facetious report. “A bipartisan commission empanelled by Congress released a report today saying that terrorists are likely to carry out a weapons-of-mass-destruction attack somewhere in the world in the next five years,” reports CNS News. “The commission concluded that the terrorists are more likely to use biological weapons than nuclear weapons and that the United States is not prepared for such an attack.”

	Shoko Asahara of the 10,000-strong Aum Shinrikyo cult. Aum’s multi-million dollar attempt to kill thousands with aerosolized liquid anthrax in Tokyo was a total failure.

Bush’s Homeland Security Council envisions “terrorists driving a truck with a concealed sprayer [that] would infect five different U.S. metropolitan areas with anthrax in two waves of attacks conducted two weeks apart.”
As with most government issued terrorist scenarios, this one is pure and unadulterated bunk.
In “Busting the Anthrax Myth” by Fred Burton and Scott Stewart, such brazen idiocy is put to rest. Burton and Stewart write that “obtaining a biological agent is fairly simple. Isolating a virulent strain and then weaponizing that strain is somewhat more difficult. But the key to biological warfare — effectively distributing a weaponized agent to the intended target — is the really difficult part of the process.”

Anyone planning a biological attack against a large target such as a city needs to be concerned about a host of factors such as dilution, wind velocity and direction, particle size and weight, the susceptibility of the disease to ultraviolet light, heat, dryness or even rain. Small-scale localized attacks such as the 2001 anthrax letters or the 1984 salmonella attack undertaken by the Bhagwan Shri Rajneesh cult are far easier to commit.

Somebody needs to remind the Homeland Security Council of the failure of the Japanese cult group Aum Shinrikyo. In the late 1980s, Aum managed to hire a team of trained scientists and spent millions of dollars to cook up a batch of botulinum toxin in state-of-the-art biological weapons research and production laboratories. In April, 1990, the group used three trucks rigged up with aerosol sprayers and released a massive amount of toxin on targets that included the Imperial Palace, the National Diet of Japan, the U.S. Embassy in Tokyo, two U.S. naval bases and the airport in Narita. It was a total failure. Aum had wanted to kick off a global Armageddon but their feeble attack did not result in mass casualties. In fact, beyond the members of the Aum cult, nobody was even aware an attack had taken place.
“When the botulinum operations failed to produce results, Aum’s scientists went back to the drawing board and retooled their biological weapons facilities to produce anthrax,” write Burton and Stewart. “By mid-1993, they were ready to launch attacks involving anthrax; between June and August of 1993, the group sprayed thousands of gallons of aerosolized liquid anthrax in Tokyo. This time, Aum not only employed its fleet of sprayer trucks but also used aerosol sprayers mounted on the roof of their headquarters to disperse a cloud of aerosolized anthrax over the city. Again, the attacks produced no results and were not even noticed. It was only after the group’s successful 1995 subway attacks using sarin nerve agent that a Japanese government investigation discovered that the 1990 and 1993 biological attacks had occurred.”
In other words, the technology required is beyond the reach of terrorists, especially fumbling cave-dwelling terrorists of the sort that attempt to bring down airliners with shoe bombs. Aum’s “team worked in large, modern laboratory facilities to produce substantial quantities of biological weapons,” not caves or huts in remote tribal villages in Pakistan, and yet they were unable to dispense biological agents effectively.

Operating in the badlands along the Pakistani-Afghan border, al Qaeda cannot easily build large modern factories capable of producing large quantities of agents or toxins. Such fixed facilities are expensive and consume a lot of resources. Even if al Qaeda had the spare capacity to invest in such facilities, the fixed nature of them means that they could be compromised and quickly destroyed by the United States.
If al Qaeda could somehow create and hide a fixed biological weapons facility in Pakistan’s Federally Administered Tribal Areas or North-West Frontier Province, it would still face the daunting task of transporting large quantities of biological agents from the Pakistani badlands to targets in the United States or Europe. Al Qaeda operatives certainly can create and transport small quantities of these compounds, but not enough to wreak the kind of massive damage it desires.

Even so, the Homeland Security Council offers the following absurd scenario:

This scenario describes a single aerosol [anthrax] attack in one city delivered by a truck using a concealed improvised spraying device in a densely populated urban city with a significant commuter workforce. It does not, however, exclude the possibility of multiple attacks in disparate cities or time-phased attacks (i.e. ‘reload’).

For federal planning purposes, it will be assumed that the Universal Adversary (UA) will attack five separate metropolitan areas in a sequential manner. Three cities will be attacked initially, followed by two additional cities 2 weeks later.
It is possible that a Bio-Watch [atmospheric sensor] signal would be received and processed, but this is not likely to occur until the day after the release. The first cases of anthrax would begin to present to Emergency Rooms (ERs) approximately 36 hours post-release, with rapid progression of symptoms and fatalities in untreated (or inappropriately treated) patients.

Nonsense. Obviously, this is a transparent effort to scare an ill-informed public into supporting the real “Universal Adversary,” the government and the corporatized military-intelligence complex. The release of this preposterous “report” arrives not coincidentally on the heels of the horrific Mumbai attacks, when images of rampaging terrorists wantonly killing innocents remains fresh in the minds of the unwitting public. It also follows closely the announcement by Def. Sec. Gates that the Pentagon will deploy troops around the country, supposedly to help in case of a terrorist attack.
It is an attempt to stampede the public into accepting the emerging police state and continued erosion of liberty. It has nothing to do with preventing a terrorist attack or safeguarding the populace. It is a parlor trick not only designed to get people to accept the high-tech surveillance state apparatus now going into place, but also accept the continued militarization of local law enforcement and the deployment of 20,000 military troops around the country.

Obama Vows US Military Rule Over Planet As 1 Million Soldiers To Secure Homeland

Sorcha Faal
Cherada
December 2, 2008




The corridors of the Kremlin are reported to be in shock today after President-Elect Barack Obama in announcing his National Security Team vowed to his countrymen that he would maintain the United States Military’s hegemony over our entire Planet during his reign.
With a budget of over $528 billion, which totals more than that of all the World’s major powers, both East and West, combined, and 761 Military Bases literally spanning our entire Earth, Russian Economists warn that by Obama’s vow the United States has given up all hopes of rescuing their collapsing economy and are, instead, preparing for all out Global War.
Even worse for the American people is that in Obama’s preparations for Global War they are to be totally militarized on a scale not seen since Adolph Hitler and the Nazis militarization of the German peoples during the 1930’s, and which US Defense Secretary Robert Gates announced last week in his “Total Force Integration Policy” that abolishes both the United States National Guard and Reserve Forces and the 1878 Posse Comitatus Act and will lead to over 1 Million US Soldiers being stationed in the American Homeland to ‘control’ their own citizens.
Russian Intelligence Analysts however, point out in their reports that these latest moves by Obama further confirm the United States plan for the use of brute military force to impose upon all of us their long planned for New World Order and is being ‘managed’ on the American side by their former Secretary of State, and acknowledge International War Criminal, Henry Kissinger who is represented in the new Obama Administration by soon to be US Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner who began his ascent to power from Kissinger Associates in the 1980’s.
Forgotten by the American people are the warnings of their ancestral leaders about these Globalist monsters that have sought for centuries to enslave our entire World, and who President Andrew Jackson spewed against in 1832 by stating:
“Gentlemen, I have had men watching you for a long time, and I am convinced that you have used the funds of the bank to speculate in the breadstuffs of the country. When you won, you divided the profits amongst you, and when you lost, you charged it to the bank. You tell me that if I take the deposits from the bank and annul its charter, I shall ruin ten thousand families. That may be true, gentlemen, but that is your sin! Should I let you go on, you will ruin fifty thousand families, and that would be my sin! You are a den of vipers and thieves. I intend to rout you out, and by the eternal God, I will rout you out.”
President Jackson fortunately, was able to protect his young American Nation from these Globalist predators and abolished their planned Central Banking System stating that:


It concentrated the nation’s financial strength in a single institution.
It exposed the government to control by foreign interests.
It served mainly to make the rich richer.
It exercised too much control over members of Congress.
It favored northeastern states over southern and western states
Today’s Americans, sadly, have not only forgotten the warnings of President Jackson but have, literally, enslaved themselves, their children and all of their future to their Central Bank known as the US Federal Reserve System, and which these deluded people don’t even realize is a private bank that has absolutely no regard for them at all and will continue stealing from them until there is nothing left.
Even worse, these Americans don’t even realize how monstrous the shadow rulers of the lives are, and which no better example can be given than the aforementioned Henry Kissinger’s statements to his Thailand counterpart in 1975 regarding the genocidal Khmer Rouge leadership of Cambodia which exterminated nearly 2 million of its own citizens, and which he stated:
“You should also tell the Cambodians that we will be friends with them. They are murderous thugs, but we won’t let that stand in our way. We are prepared to improve relations with them.”
How wise it would be for these American people to remember the words of President Woodrow Wilson who in warning his people of the “invisible empire has been set up above the forms of democracy” stated that “a little group of willful men, representing no opinion but their own, have rendered the great government of the United States helpless and contemptible”.
How wiser still for them to remember Wilson’s greatest warning about who really controls the United States: “Since I entered politics, I have chiefly had men’s views confided to me privately. Some of the biggest men in the U.S., in the field of commerce and manufacturing, are afraid of somebody, are afraid of something. They know that there is a power somewhere so organized, so subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive, that they had better not speak above their breath when they speak in condemnation of it.”
But, and sadly, to those like us, both past and present, attempting to warn these peoples of the catastrophes to come they listen not and continue being led upon a path that can only lead to their complete enslavement and ultimate destruction.

Supreme Court Sends Citizenship Appeal to an Anthrax Lab

Posted on December 2, 2008

Who is this man?

U.S. Supreme Court Building in Washington D.C.

U.S. Supreme Court Justices

As expected, President-elect Barack Obama and the Democrat National Committee (DNC) let yesterday’s Supreme Court deadline to respond to Philip Berg’s Writ of Certiorari slip by unanswered, but it appears even at the Supreme Court, a deadline is not really a deadline as the Court allows two additional days for “mail service.”
Associate Justice David Souter denied an emergency appeal for the Court to halt the Electoral College’s tabulation of votes to officially declare Barack Obama the President, until proof of his eligibility is affirmed. While Souter denied the appeal, he did set the above mentioned requirement for a response from Obama and the DNC.
Attorney Philip Berg, this morning, filed an emergency injunction with the Court to bar Obama from taking the oath of office of the Presidency. Jeff at America’s Right interprets Berg’s motion as follows:

From what I could gather, the emergency motion for immediate injunction contains two main parts — in filing the motion, Berg is looking for the Court
(1) to prohibit the certification of electors by the governors of each individual state in order to stay the Electoral College from casting votes for Obama on December 15, and
(2) to stay the official counting of any votes for Obama by Vice President Dick Cheney, the House of Representatives and United States Senate on January 6, 2009, pending any decision on his appeal.

Berg is quoted as saying that he is one-thousand percent certain that Obama is not a natural-born U.S. citizen. Obama and the DNC are not “obligated” to file an answer, and Berg says that he “believes that the lack of response could be rooted less in procedure and more in audacity…” “The feeling may be that, if they respond, they could hold themselves out for perjury later on when we’re successful.”
As November 4th neared, a few of us were desperately attempting to get this information to the public. Surely, we thought (bloggers) this was an important and valid issue. After all, the Supreme Court ordered Obama to provide proof of his U.S. birth. How many times has that happened? But the MSM wouldn’t touch it. I thought the media, including cable television, viewed this as too ludicrous to even consider, but as time passed, credible reasons to believe that Obama could not provide proof of his U.S. birth, began piling up. Someone, for some reason, was able to keep this out of the MSM.
Here are other actions at work at the Supreme Court:
Donofrio v. Wells will be heard by the full Court with Justice Clarence Thomas chairing the Conference on December 5th. The purpose of the Conference is to consider granting Certiorari, which allows further review of the original lawsuit.

If 4 of the 9 Justices respond in the affirmative to Leo’s [Donofrio] case, there will be an oral argument and further briefing. If 5 of the 9 Justices respond in the affirmative, they could grant a stay of the Electoral College vote.

Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz “has been officially tendered to the Supreme Court…” All things get weirder when it concerns Barack Obama. Wrotnowski, allegedly, was told by the Court that his emergency stay renewal was referred to an ANTHRAX CONTAINMENT FACILITY! A reader left this information on a Maggie’s Notebook post, and it appears that is exactly what Wrotnowski is saying he was told in a telephone conversation (read more below).
Hunter v. Obama sent to the Supreme Court
For detailed information and commentary read the terrific work by The Right Side of Life which also reports this intriguing information:

There is also a rumor that the full Court may be seriously considering staying the Electoral College vote until after Barack Obama’s eligibility can be confirmed (the following excerpt from Bob Vernon of Honest American News (Plains Radio Network):

Today I spoke with Patricia McCabe Estrada, Deputy Director of Public Information at the United States Supreme Court. She informed me that Mr. Donofrio’s application was first referred to the full Court by Justice Clarence Thomas on November 19, 2008. After that referral took place the full Court, and not Justice Thomas alone, distributed the application for an emergency stay for Conference of December 5, 2008. [emphasis mine]

We now know that the renewed request to halt the election was not denied and is actively being considered at the Supreme Court.

The We the People Foundation placed a full page in the Chicago Tribune, running on December 1st and 3rd:

The Open Letter to Mr. Obama is a formal Petition for a Redress (Remedy) for the alleged violation of the “natural born citizen” clause of the Constitution of the United States of America.
Mr. Obama is respectfully requested to direct the Hawaiian officials to provide access to his original birth certificate on December 5-7 by our team of forensic scientists, and to provide additional documentary evidence establishing his citizenship status prior to our Washington, D.C. press conference on December 8.
A First Amendment Petition to any official of the Government for Redress of a violation of the Constitution is substantially different from the garden-variety political petitions frequently received by government officials. This Petition demands it be given the highest priority for an expedited review and official Response by Mr. Obama.
As a formal “Notice of a Constitutional Violation,” the Petition naturally includes the People’s inherent Right to an official Response. As a time-sensitive, election related Petition involving the Office of the President, failure to Respond as requested would constitute an egregious breach of the public trust and confirm the certainty of a Constitutional crisis.

Dr. Orly Taitz reports numerous phone calls to the SC demanding to know why Cort Wrotnowski’s Petition for Stay of Elections was delayed by 7 days because it was sent to an anthrax lab:

Mr. Wrotnowski is a law abiding citizen, a business owner, was never in trouble with the law. Why was his petition delayed by a week via sending it to the Anthrax lab. No response was received, no name of the clerk was given. These clerks are sabotaging anti Obama cases to put a foreigner in the White House, this is bordering on aiding and abetting treason.

Dr. Taitz is asking for our help:

Please write to all 9 judges, let them know what is going on, demand to join all 5 cases currently in the Supreme Court, you can send them a copy of our Keyes v Bowen petition for Writ of Mandate as a supporting document. Currently I am working on filing a second case, representing another group of candidates, party officials, Certified Electors and Registered voters and I am assisting other attorneys all around the country, that are preparing similar actions and trying to match voters and electors in different states with attorneys that can represent them.

Here’s contact information (if you have previous written, please continue to do so):

The Honorable Associate Justice
Clarence Thomas
United States Supreme Court
One First St. N. E.
Washington DC 20543
Put docket # on Envelope 08-A407
Ask him to UPHOLD our Constitution with Full Disclosure as the only Constitutionally viable answer.

Also, send identical requests to the remaining Justices: Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Associate Justices David H. Souter, Ruth Bader Ginsberg, Antonin G. Scalia, John Paul Stevens, Samuel A. Alito, Anthony M. Kennedy, Stephen G. Breyer

Read more about Dr. Taitz’s attempts to hold Barack Obama accountable.
America, this is no small thing.

HOW OBAMA WILL(Further) RUIN AMERICA

THE DISINTEGRATION OF ALL THAT WE HOLD DEAR IN AMERICA will continue at an even more accelerated pace under the Obama presidency. Obama, a clinically pathological liar, conned and mesmerized tens of millions of Americans, and multiple special interest groups, during the long and utterly contrived and stage-managed political ‘campaign’ season.
Like those of most corrupt politicians, Obama’s promises and commitments usually stemmed directly from political convenience and many of them have already been shredded. Those that will be kept will only be preserved because they are in his best interests to do so…and to please his controllers.
Obama’s handlers, the Military/Zionist Complex, maintain a solid choke hold on our nation, and have installed a mind-numbing roster of thugs, criminals, and the most corrupt career politicians and bureaucrats in America to ensure the CONTINUED acceleration of the demise of our way of life. As has been the case under Bush Jr, and the Clintons before him, the plan remains the same: the abject weakening to the point of implosion of the moral, social, financial, and educational systems upon which America once stood rock solid and proud on the world stage.
Now, America is a frail, war-whoring, financially bankrupt shell of a country…mocked, hated and spat upon by the majority of the world’s population. This, of course, is the Zionist plan…the Protocols laid it out for all to see…a plan that will guarantee the total control of our lives by the Military/Zionist elite.
The puppet king, Obama, whose soul is owned by the Chicago Zionist Jewish machine, among other power entities - will sign into law their Executive Orders (Royal Decrees and Proclamations) so as to accomplish the final subversion of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness in this once free and noble Republic:
Compulsory Military Service: Obama has repeatedly called for a Civilian National Security Force which will require high school students to perform 50 hours per year of civilian service as an adjunct to the US military.
Obama’s Chief of Staff, the Zionist Jew, Rahm Emanuel, is on record for promoting compulsory service for Americans ages 18 to 25. Service would include three months of basic training & civil defense preparation. Emanuel has also said he sees no reason why ALL Americans should not do national public service.
Abortion On Demand: Obama promised during his campaign that the first Bill he will sign as President is the Freedom Of Choice Act legalizing on-demand abortion nationwide. This Bill will nullify any state or local restrictions on abortion.
Nationally Mandated Same-Sex Marriages: Obama promised to sign into law a repeal of the Defense of Marriage Act. DOMA allows individual states the authority not to recognize same-sex marriages from another state. Repeal of DOMA would usher in nationally mandated same-sex marriages. View Obama’s Lesbian Gay Bisexual Transgender (LGBT) Interview Here & LGBT For Obama Here.
Hate Crime Legislation: Obama has promised to expand ‘hate crime’ legislation by passing the Matthew Shepard Act. This will be yet another nail in the coffin of America’s right to freedom of speech by targeting those Americans opposed to homosexuality & lesbianism.
Forced Hiring Of Homosexuals: Obama has promised to enact the Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA) which would force employers to hire homosexuals & lesbians. Churches & religious organizations opposed to deviant sexual behavior would be prosecuted for refusing to conform to ENDA requirements.
Dictated Radio Agendas: Obama has promised to reinstitute the Fairness Doctrine which would obviously be used to target, cripple and emasculate alternative talk radio shows. The aim of the Fairness Doctrine is to ensure that coverage of controversial issues by broadcast stations be ‘balanced and fair’ & and ‘politically correct.’
The Fairness Doctrine grew out of an FCC ‘concern’ that due to the large number of applications for radio licenses - & the limited number of frequencies available - broadcasters would be mandated not to use their stations to advocate a singular perspective - but to air ALL ‘worthy’ points of view…to be determined by the FCC and powerful special interest groups, such as the Jewish Lobby, of course.
Under the Fairness Doctrine, alternative radio shows such as the popular Jeff Rense Program @ Rense.com will be forced to present views which run contrary to the broadcasters’ opinions.
A DRAMATIC SHIFT TO TOTALITARIANISM is about to take place under an Obama presidency. These pieces of legislation that Obama has promised to sign will guarantee the end of much of what remains of our historical freedom and liberty.
DO NOT BE FOOLED
OBAMA IS A FRAUD, AN INTEL CUTOUT,
A SOCK PUPPET OF THE MILITARY/ZIONIST COMPLEX
WHICH SEEKS TOTAL CONTROL & DOMINATION OF OUR LIVES
___________________________________
For More See: Obama’s “Zero To Five” Big Brother Plan Click Here And: Obama’s ‘Zionist’ Chief Of Staff Click Here
And: Obama’s War Plans & Forced ‘Home Service’ Click Here
And: Obama & The Coming Military State Click Here
And: Obama To Lead Fourth Reich Click Here

Berg V. Obama - The Day of Reckoning

Berg v. Obama: The Day of Reckoning

Thomas J. Latino, Esq.

Thomas.latino@biotechcapitalgroup.com

The deadline has come and gone. At 5pm Eastern Standard Time, yesterday, December 1st, 2008 the case of Berg v. Obama reached a seminal moment. Yesterday was the deadline for the Obama legal team to file their response to the Berg Petition for a Writ of Certiorari. There was nothing. According to the Supreme Court's docket for the case nothing was filed overnight. Mr. Obama has done what hasn't been done before, he has made history twice, Mr. Obama has blatantly ignored a request from the Supreme Court of the United States—our highest and most revered legal institution; Mr. Obama, quiet frankly has thumbed his nose at the highest court in our land.

Being an attorney, I know full well that Rule 11 of the United States Supreme Court does not specifically dictate a Respondent file a reply brief "unless specifically ordered by the Court"—and to be fair we have no evidence to show that Mr. Obama was indeed ordered by the Court to produce such a reply. However, it is out of sheer reverence and respect for the institution, if not to underscore the merits of your case and the lacking of your opponents' that almost ALL Respondents file some sort of reply with the court. Mr. Obama's actions yesterday reek of a type of arrogance that even I as an attorney never displayed to any court nor have I ever witnessed such flippant behavior during my legal career.

This is not some low level circuit court; this is the United States Supreme Court. Why would the Obama legal team find it necessary to work so diligently in the Federal Court in Pennsylvania filing Motions to Dismiss and Protective Orders and not even file a Waiver of Rights with the Supreme Court? One can surmise two logical possible explanations for Mr. Obama's strategy: (1) Mr. Obama is putting all his chips on the hopes that 4 justices will view Mr. Berg's petition as laughable and deny his Petition for the Writ and (2) Refer to #1.

So what now? Now the issue rests with 9 robed clad justices residing in the inner most chambers of America's most revered legal institution. We will know more likely than not before the week is out whether or not the court will hear this case. The justices now find themselves in a most unenviable position. They have to way the consequences of their actions. If they vote to hear the case, do they stay the Electoral College vote? And if they find for Berg what then? Do we have new elections if Mr. Obama fails to show he is a natural born citizen and who will be responsible for setting a time table?

What if they deny Berg's petition? That answer is relatively simple. This issue goes away once and for all. The other 14 lawsuits pending in various states will suffer a mortal blow—all the district courts in those cases will do is cite the US Supreme Court case of Berg v. Obama ___ US____ (2008) as binding precedent and that will be that.

What will the justices have to consider? These 9 justices are charged with deciding if one American citizen has the standing to legitimately challenge the constitutional qualifications of our President-Elect. A man who will be our leader, our public servant, our Commander in Chief; a man who will, god forbid, be charged with the responsibility of sending our sons, daughters, husbands, wives, aunts, uncles, cousins, brothers and sisters into harms way to fight and possibly die for our beloved nation. The court will determine if Berg is directly injured by Obama's transgressions. If Berg has any siblings in the US Armed forces, it would seem he would have a direct interest and the possibility for direct harm if the President sent his sibling to fight and die should not have been allowed to serve in the first place. Indeed, all Americans would have a vested interest and thus standing.

As noteworthy as this argument is, the court has not forgotten Bush v. Gore and the fallout that decision created. There are those on the court that remember the hit the court's approval rating took after many on the left accused it of "stealing" an election and "injecting law into a political, democratic process". These are valid arguments; after all, judges are political animals at heart; they have to be elected to the local circuit and to be successfully elected one has to be a decent politician. It is for this reason that I am still uncertain as to what the court will ultimately decide. On one hand we have the gravity of the US Constitution, Article 2 Section 1; on the other we have a court who has its ear to the ground, who can ascertain the public fallout not only if they agree to hear the case but if the eventually were to find for Berg. It is very likely, the court will decide to simply "punt" the issue and avoid opening a can of worms.

I conclude this article with a simple question that I realize will generate a myriad of responses, "If Mr. Berg, an American citizen, does not hold the right to challenge the constitutional requirements of the President-Elect of the United States, then who among us will ever; who among us will have the authority to challenge such an individual if there are legitimate questions surrounding his or her qualifications?" Some will undoubtedly answer that Congress is the only one to hold such authority. Do we really want a partisan, elected body -many of them belonging to the same party as the President-Elect involved in such an issue? Allowing Congressmen to interject themselves would turn the process into some sort of morbid, grand-standing ploy, everyone clamoring for their 15 seconds of fame. This issue is something Congress would be to inept to handle.

If Berg's Petition is granted, it will be an oral argument session that will go down as one of the seminal moments in the judiciary's 200 year history. There is no greater charge entrusted to the Supreme Court than to prevent any grievous usurpation of the US Constitution; it is there solemn duty—regardless of political ideology or identification—to entrust the fundamental rule of law is upheld.

Top Expert - Obama's COLB A Criminal FRAUD

Imaging guru: 'Certification' of birth time, location is fake
'It would be hard to perform as president from behind jail cell door at Leavenworth'

---

Posted: December 01, 2008
10:20 pm Eastern

By Bob Unruh
© 2008 WorldNetDaily

A document expert contends the "Certification of Live Birth" Barack Obama's campaign posted online to rebut charges the president-elect fails the Constitution's natural-born citizen requirement is criminally fraudulent.
The Obama campaign has told WND such allegations are "garbage," but Ron Polarik, who holds a Ph.D. in instructional media specializing in computer technology such as printers, scanners and digital imaging, disagrees. His analyses have been posted online in a YouTube video, which also is embedded here:

Polarik explained to WND his four months of research on the images, including nearly 1,000 test images using actual scans and photographs of real certificates, indicate there are several "giveaways" on the image itself. For example, the document has gray and white between the lettering, not green pixels as the rest of the background document, suggesting someone cut-and-pasted or typed new information that was embedded on top of the background.
Where's the proof Barack Obama was born in the U.S. and thus a "natural born American" as required by Article 2, Section 1 of the Constitution? If you still want to see it, sign WND's petition demanding the release of his birth certificate.
Also, Polarik said although the Obama form has a border like that used in Hawaii in 2007, the seal is like that used in 2006 or 2008, but not 2007. His full report is posted at Polarik.blogtownhall.com.
In Polarik's view, there has to be a significant reason for a political candidate and campaign to go to such lengths.
"Obviously, there's something very critical to hide, or they wouldn't have spent the million dollars in legal fees to prevent the release of his original birth certificate," Polarik told WND.

"There's absolutely something to hide," he said. "If he was born in Hawaii they would have had a luau that would be continuing today.
"Not that the people who voted for him would care," he said, "but they used this forged document to convince the American voters.
"It's a scary thought to have someone who essentially begins his presidency as a criminal," he said, because the use of a faked document as identification is, in fact, a crime, he noted.
"It would be hard to perform as president from behind jail cell door at Leavenworth," he said.
The video has Polarik's face and voice disguised, and he confirmed to WND he's using an assumed name because of the threats. Independent verification of his credentials was not immediately available.
Polarik said the issue of the birth location is a "chink" in Obama's armor, but the Democrat also has declined to release information about his college years, about his selective service and about his passports, including on what nation's passport he traveled to Pakistan two decades ago when it was illegal to go there as a U.S. citizen.
Polarik describes his findings and conclusions on the video.
Polarik's conclusions were disputed, however, by another blog, the Hackerfactor.com.
Writer Neal Krawetz argues the "missing green" is a result of the compression algorithm used to generate the image. He also insists there's no validity to alarms over the border, because "we don't know the history of the actual image (was this a scan converted to JPEG, resaved as another JPEG, etc.). What we do know is that the image is at a very low quality, and JPEG loses fine details when saved at a low quality."
"I and other analysts have been unable to identify any sign of digital manipulation," the blogger wrote.
He also said Polarik is just "wrong" about the seal issue, and he addressed the second-fold dispute.
"I must admit that I do not see the second fold. However, I have scanned many pieces of folded paper and not seen folds (scanners pick up color, not texture)," Krawetz wrote.
Meanwhile, Dan Purdy of Forensic Document Examination Services Inc. told WND that the origins of the Internet images aren't known. He raised questions over whether the "original" was a photocopy, the equipment used to create the digital image and the compression processes of the various formats.
Those factors, he wrote, "make it exceedingly difficult to properly interpret fine details in the image."
WND columnist Janet Porter has written extensively about the birth certification issue.
"Look, we're not asking for the world here. Neither is the Constitution. Some pretty basic requirements like being 35 years old, having 14 years residency in the United States, and being a natural born citizen. When Senator John McCain was questioned about it, he showed his birth certificate without hesitating. When Barack Obama was asked by courts including the U.S. Supreme Court, he ducked and hid behind the right to privacy," she writes.
"Ironically, when Obama was running for the State Senate, he won by disqualifying every candidate who ran against him in the primary, including a guy who had been through a nasty and salacious divorce. Even though he had a small child who could be hurt by the information being made public, a court decided that the public's right to know; outweighed this poor fella's right to privacy, and he backed out. Obama clings to the 'right to privacy' regarding his own qualifications, just not his opponents."
She also noted the issue won't go away, and recommended a visit to ObamaForgery.com to review what's happening.
"These are the facts," she wrote. "The Constitution requires the president to be a natural born citizen. Obama's grandmother said she was there when Barack was born in Kenya. Obama refuses to release his original birth certificate. Instead of a birth certificate, Obama's campaign posted a certification given to those born abroad. Experts have called even that document an 'obvious forgery.'"
"Our Constitution still matters," she said.
Her group, Faith2Action, is working on funding for the purchase of time for a new television ad on the issue.
In the Philadelphia Bulletin, constitutional lawyer Edwin Vieira said a multitude of problems could result.
"Let's assume he wasn't born in the U.S.," Vieira told the newspaper. "What's the consequence? He will not be eligible. That means he cannot be elected validly. The people and the Electoral College cannot overcome this and the House of Representatives can't make him president. So what's the next step? He takes the oath of office, and assuming he's aware he's not a citizen, then it's a perjured oath.

The "eligible" President-elect Obama

"He may have nominated people to different positions; he may have nominated people to the judicial branch, who may have been confirmed, they may have gone out on executive duty and done various things," said Vieira. "The people that he's put into the judicial branch may have decided cases, and all of that needs to be unzipped."
"Let's say we go a year into this process, and it all turns out to be a flim-flam," he told the newspaper. "What's the nation's reaction to that? What's going to be the reaction in the next U.S. election? God knows. It has almost revolutionary consequences, if you think about it."
He continued, "[The birth certificate], in theory, should be there. What if it isn't? Who knows, aside from Mr. Obama? Does Russian intelligence know it isn't there? Does Chinese intelligence know it isn't there? Does the CIA know that it isn't there? Who is in a position to blackmail this fellow?"
Vieira expressed confidence Obama eventually will be forced to produce documentation.
"Let's assume that an Obama administration passes some of these controversial pieces of legislation he has been promising to go for, like the FOCA (Freedom of Choice) Act," he told the newspaper. "I would assume that some of those surely will have some severe civil or criminal penalties attached to them for violation. You are now the criminal defendant under this statute, which was passed by an Obama Congress and signed by President Obama. Your defense is that is not a statute because Mr. Obama is not the president. You now have a right and I have never heard this challenged, to subpoena in a criminal case, anyone who has relevant evidence relating to your defenses. And you can subpoena them duces tecum, meaning 'you shall bring with you the documents.'"
WND founder and editor Joseph Farah has launched a program to allow concerned voters to express their desire directly to the U.S. Supreme Court for the issue to be resolved.
A conference among the justices is scheduled Friday on a New England challenge to Obama's eligibility.
"The case is brought by Leo C. Donofrio against Nina Wells, the New Jersey secretary of state, and questions whether Obama is a 'natural-born citizen' as required by Article 2, Section 1 of the Constitution," Farah reported.
"It would seem a simple matter to resolve," he said. "Barack Obama could have put this issue to rest long ago by producing a complete birth certificate from Hawaii. Instead, he has chosen to stonewall the matter, citing a website post of what can only be characterized as a partial representation of a birth certificate – one that has been criticized as a forgery.
"Meanwhile, some of Obama's own Kenyan relatives claim to have been present at his birth in Mombasa. This controversy, which some have dismissed as frivolous, is as serious as the literal meaning of the Constitution itself."
The nation's Electoral College, the process through which Obama is to be formally voted as the next president, will meet Dec. 15, and his inaugural is scheduled Jan. 20.
Meanwhile, more than 125,000 have signed WND's petition seeking full disclosure of Obama's information.
The petition cites the U.S. Constitution's requirement that no one can be sworn into office as president without being a natural born citizen. It also asserts there are questions about Obama's reported Hawaii birth, that the Democrat has refused repeated calls to document his birth, that activist judges have declined to require him to shed light on the issue and that Hawaii – at the time of Obama's birth – allowed parents whose children were born in other locations to register the birth there.
WND's petition is available online, and more information is available at this link.

Obama, the Supreme Court, and HIGH TREASON

Rense.com Exclusive
By Devvy
12-2-8

 

Leo Donofrio called me on December 1, 2008, with more news regarding treachery inside the U.S. Supreme Court. These lawsuits are challenging Obama's constitutional eligibility to serve as president of these united States of America.   For those unfamiliar with Leo and his lawsuit docketed at the U.S. Supreme Court, please see this news item:   http://www.rense.com/general84/scotus.htm   At the time Leo provided me with the update in the link above, he also informed me there was another case out of Connecticut that he was assisting on and would let me know the details soon. This is the case:   Cort Wrotnowski v. Susan Bysiewicz, Secretary of the State of Connecticut - http://www.filesend.net/download.php?f=fb6dc015edba6d8ec689b56a06b79d0b docket no. 08A469 http://origin.www.supremecourtus.gov/docket/08a469.htm   Leo informed me by phone that he wrote the 39 page brief for Cort. It was submitted to the Supreme Court and (no surprise) rejected by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg. Perhaps she was asleep when it came across her desk, as that seems to be how she spends her time serving the people of this nation: asleep on the bench.   As is his right, Cort resubmitted to Justice Scalia. This filing is an emergency stay application and should have been addressed immediately. Instead, and this is beyond outrageous: someone inside the Supreme Court referred Cort's over night mail package for anthrax testing!    To say Leo was beyond words in expressing himself over this insanity is an under statement. Leo explained that Cort Wrotnowski is the quintessential example of the average American: married, two children, owns his own health food store and access to any anthrax by Cort is impossible. Not only is it impossible, the idea is preposterous and nothing but a smokescreen.   Why would a clerk do such a thing? We have to remember that Leo's case will be conferenced by all nine supreme court justices, December 5, 2008. Make no mistake about it: this is history in the making. The electoral college votes December 15, 2008. A massive drive has been underway for weeks to reach out to the electoral college delegates in the 35 affected states with the facts about Obama the mystery man.   Cort's case should have been enjoined with Leo's and under 'normal' circumstances would be - except for the continued interference by clerks at the U.S. Supreme Court. Leo and Cort were informed by the PIO (Public Information Officer) at the Supreme Court that the anthrax testing process would take nine days. Perfect timing to foil enjoining of the two cases.    Leo lamented in his frustration that he simply cannot believe what has been happening over these lawsuits. "This is the U.S. Supreme Court we're talking about," said Leo. "This is where the American people go for justice and look at what is happening!"    Indeed. These events involving Barack Hussein Obama and his eligibility under the U.S. Constitution to serve as president is historical and has never happened in our life time. Not only is the prostitute media ignoring this issue of paramount importance, now the supreme court justices are being manipulated. Outrageous doesn't even begin to cover such chicanery.   Leo has asked me to please get this information published as soon as possible. Ladies and gentlemen: What we are seeing in Washington, DC, is a mockery of everything this country has stood for and what we will stand for in the future. As Leo said, these justices are going to determine the next president of these united States of America. We the people are being short changed by obliviously politically driven non elected personnel inside the Supreme Court. We cannot remain silent.   Regular readers of my columns know I have several FOIAs (Freedom of Information Act Requests) underway. I also filed a state records act request with the University of Hawaii, Manoa, regarding Stanley Ann Dunham, Obama's mother. This request is determine whether or not she was attending college as claimed during the time Obama was allegedly born in Hawaii. Dunham graduated from high school in 1960. Her family then relocated to Hawaii where she enrolled at the University of Hawaii at Manoa.     There she met Barack Obama, Sr. They married on February 2, 1961; Dunham was three months pregnant at the time. According to the University of Hawaii, Obama's mother attended school in the fall of 1960, but did not return to their campus until Spring of 1963. See Attached UH Registrar Letter             Two of my FOIAs involve records from the U.S. State Department regarding Dunham's departure(s) from the U.S. and arrival(s) back onto U.S. soil during 1961. To date, I haven't received a response from them, but it is apparent that Obama's mother was not in school during the entire year of 1961, 1962 and part of 1963.     Two things that must get done and don't think our numbers aren't growing and we won't be heard. Despite the glaring conspiracy of silence by the prostitute "mainstream media" in this country, and that includes cable networks (FAUX, CNN and MSNBC who did one hit piece on this issue), you can bet all the justices know of this huge controversy and that until the issue of Obama's true citizenship is proven, it isn't going to go away, i.e.:   Litigation over Sen. Obama's Citizenship:  Orders from new president to spark lawsuit every time   http://www.usjf.net/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file =article&sid=471&mode=thread&order=0&thold=0   If you are a radio talk show host, Leo would like to be a guest on your show to talk about these historical events. For media only, please, his phone number is 732.546.5094. If you have a favorite talk show you listen to, please ask that host to book Leo and get friends, family and business associates to tune in and listen.    While I just got back from 17 days on the road, first thing tomorrow I'm sending my letter over night mail to Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr. I am going to politely inform him there is treachery going on inside his court by clerks impeding the judicial process by a legitimate Petitioner. I'll provide a brief history behind both Leo and Cort's applications.    I'm asking you to do the same. You can send your letter to Justice Roberts here:    Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr. Supreme Court of the United States One First Street N.E. Washington, DC 20543   You don't have to use over night mail because it is expensive, but it only takes 15 minutes to type out a letter to Chief Justice Roberts and let him know what's going on. Cut and paste this news item if it's helpful. I'm also sending a copy of my letter to Congressmen Ron Paul and Ted Poe at their district offices. I'll include just a short note asking them to investigate this matter because it must stop. This type of interference in the business of the U.S. Supreme Court cannot be allowed to continue.   Leo would like everyone to call the PIO at the U.S. Supreme Court and leave a message explaining that we the people know about the manipulation going on and are contacting members of Congress. The number to call is 202.479.3000   Stand up Americans like Leo Donofrio and Cort Wrotnowski have put their money, toil and sweat into these lawsuits because their cause is noble. They seek the truth and upholding the supreme law of the land: the U.S. Constitution. We the people must stand behind them and do our part, too. Please get those letters in the mail asap and stay on talk show hosts to have Leo as a guest.